Why should this document, addressed to all people of good will, include a chapter dealing with the convictions of believers? I am well aware that in the areas of politics and philosophy there are those who firmly reject the idea of a Creator, or consider it irrelevant, and consequently dismiss as irrational the rich contribution which religions can make towards an integral ecology and the full development of humanity. Others view religions simply as a subculture to be tolerated. Nonetheless, science and religion, with their distinctive approaches to understanding reality, can enter into an intense dialogue fruitful for both.
top of page
Search
Recent Posts
See AllThis situation has led to a constant schizophrenia, wherein a technocracy which sees no intrinsic value in lesser beings coexists with...
Neglecting to monitor the harm done to nature and the environmental impact of our decisions is only the most striking sign of a disregard...
Modernity has been marked by an excessive anthropocentrism which today, under another guise, continues to stand in the way of shared...
bottom of page
Comentarios